ULIPs | Mutual Funds | |
Investment amounts | Determined by the investor and can be modified as well | Minimum investment amounts are determined by the fund house |
Expenses | No upper limits, expenses determined by the insurance company | Upper limits for expenses chargeable to investors have been set by the regulator |
Portfolio disclosure | Not mandatory* | Quarterly disclosures are mandatory |
Modifying asset allocation | Generally permitted for free or at a nominal cost | Entry/exit loads have to be borne by the investor |
Tax benefits | Section 80C benefits are available on all ULIP investments | Section 80C benefits are available only on investments in tax-saving funds |
May be days will come with 100% portfolio disclosure for all the ULIPs as well. But does it affect the choice? As long as the investor is not having any say in portfolio management, all these standardised portfolios make no difference for the investor's choice.
Consider a person investing in a Mutual Fund scheme and another in an Insurance plan and watch the final outcome over a nine year period.
Look at the table:
Particulars | ULIP Invesor | Mutual Fund Investor |
Plan | Invest 50,000 per year for retirement | |
Option | ULIP | Mutual Fund + Term plan for insurance cover |
Insurance | 5 lakhs | 10 lakhs |
Premium | Part of the money paid Ceases when fund>5lakhs. | Separately, Rs. 3,000 per year. 47,000 left for investment |
Investment choice | ICICI Pru LifeTime | HDFC Equity Fund |
Now look at what happens over the holding period?
For ULIP Investor | ||||||||
Costs | Amount | |||||||
Year | Invested | Upfront | Mortality | Left | NAV | Units | Total Units | Value |
1 | 50,000 | 9,000 | 900 | 40,100 | 10.47 | 3,829.99 | 3,829.99 | 40,100 |
2 | 50,000 | 3,750 | 800 | 45,450 | 11.38 | 3,993.85 | 7,823.84 | 89,035 |
3 | 50,000 | 2,000 | 700 | 47,300 | 21.79 | 2,170.72 | 9,994.56 | 217,781 |
4 | 50,000 | 2,000 | 500 | 47,500 | 25.17 | 1,887.17 | 11,881.73 | 299,063 |
5 | 50,000 | 2,000 | 400 | 47,600 | 33.83 | 1,407.04 | 13,288.76 | 449,559 |
6 | 50,000 | 2,000 | 200 | 47,800 | 46.74 | 1,022.68 | 14,311.44 | 668,917 |
7 | 50,000 | 2,000 | 0 | 48,000 | 68.76 | 698.08 | 15,009.52 | 1,032,055 |
8 | 50,000 | 2,000 | 0 | 48,000 | 37.39 | 1,283.77 | 16,293.29 | 609,206 |
9 | 50,000 | 2,000 | 0 | 48,000 | 63.07 | 761.06 | 17,054.35 | 1,075,618 |
Total Invested | 450,000 | |||||||
Total Commissions | 26,750 | |||||||
Current Value | 1,075,618 | |||||||
Mutual fund Investor :Term Plan + Mutual Fund | ||||||||
Costs | Amount | |||||||
Year | Invested | Upfront | Mortality | Left | NAV | Units | Total Units | Value |
1 | 50,000 | 1,125 | 3,000 | 45,875 | 18.44 | 2,487.80 | 2,487.80 | 45,875 |
2 | 50,000 | 1,125 | 3,000 | 45,875 | 22.61 | 2,028.97 | 4,516.77 | 102,124 |
3 | 50,000 | 1,125 | 3,000 | 45,875 | 52.91 | 867.04 | 5,383.81 | 284,857 |
4 | 50,000 | 1,125 | 3,000 | 45,875 | 66.39 | 690.99 | 6,074.80 | 403,306 |
5 | 50,000 | 1,125 | 3,000 | 45,875 | 107.19 | 427.98 | 6,502.78 | 697,033 |
6 | 50,000 | 1,125 | 3,000 | 45,875 | 147.29 | 311.46 | 6,814.24 | 1,003,669 |
7 | 50,000 | 1,125 | 3,000 | 45,875 | 224.59 | 204.26 | 7,018.50 | 1,576,285 |
8 | 50,000 | 1,125 | 3,000 | 45,875 | 114.52 | 400.58 | 7,419.08 | 849,647 |
9 | 50,000 | 0 | 3,000 | 47,000 | 232.55 | 202.11 | 7,621.18 | 1,772,306 |
Total Invested | 450,000 | |||||||
Total Commissions | 9,000 | |||||||
Current Value | 1,772,306 |
A combination of mutual fund/s and a term planworks out cheaper as the charges involved are only those for fund management and mortality. In an ULIP, however, there are charges on allocation, policy administration, mortality and fund management.
The new guidelines will stop ULIPs being positioned as short term investments products, and they will look less like mutual funds and more like insurance policies
Insights:
1) Do not bother about tax saving. So much has changed since I bought a product 9 years ago, and so much more will change going forward, all towards taxing of potential gains. The only thing one should care about is that investment mustn't be taxed while "accumulating" the growth - only when he/she exit. In that regard, fixed deposits are out.
2) Costs matter. The more one pay for a product, the more it hurts later. In fact, a product that costs higher in the initial days seems to destroy your compounding potential.
3) Performance matters. While one might have chosen a badly performing fund and another person a great one, in the end the fund that does better will win. But fund performance cannot be taken for granted or assumed, the only thing one must have is the ability to shift out of a badly performing product. With a ULIP you really don't have that freedom - you can't just shift to another ULIP without paying huge upfront costs.
4) Insurance and Investment are two different needs. The advantage of "insurance" was cursory - it was terribly inadequate with the ULIP in any case.
Decide for yourself.
ULIPs are useful for small ticket insurance purposes. For those having insurance needs upto Rs15 lakhs appx. But for those need higher insurance cover, should go for better options.
Those who read this also read
Saving Through Protection Plan
No comments:
Post a Comment